as some you know, we had to put back into kaneohe after trying to head north. in a nutshell, it was just too tough! instead of the 10 knot easterlies which were forecast ,we had building winds from the ne 18-23. we toughed it out for 3 days, covering 450 miles in 3 days, all with the #4 jib and a double reefed main. the swell was slightly different angel from the wind waves, so we were slamming constatnly. water sluicing over the boat at all times, lots of little leaks below. the third night, the newer and ostensibly more robust of the two tillerpilots crapped out, leaving us with only the old one for the remaining 1900 miles to seattle. the next morning the wind built to 24 knots. the barometer was only at 1017 si cash loans las vegas we knew it was a LONG way to more moderate winds. so we put about, and after another 3 ugly ugly days we are safe and sound back in Kaneohe, which is truly as close to heaven as you can imagine. will head into honolulu tomorrow to make arrangements for shipping the boat back. not wild about the money aspect, but i really think it would have been stupid and dangerous to conintue on. hope you are all well....tiz
I have been unusually quiet here recently because I have been going through a major transition. About six weeks ago, I joined Deloitte & Touche USA LLP with a mandate to establish a major new research center in Silicon Valley. The Center will explore key business issues created by the intersection of business strategy and information technology. I will be serving as Co-Chairman of the new research center along with John Seely Brown and we have already enlisted the support of Lang Davison as Chief Content Officer. Until co-founding the center with us, Lang had been the Editor of The McKinsey Quarterly. Lang and I go way back in terms of our collaboration – in fact, he was a key collaborator in the development and writing of both Net Gain and Net Worth and has edited all our subsequent Quarterly articles. Last week, Kevin Werbach asked me to address his Supernova conference and offer a preview of some of the questions that will form the foundation of the research agenda for the new center. We are still at a very early stage in defining the research agenda, but it was a great opportunity to get some feedback and input from very smart folks. It occurred to me that I could throw the net even broader free online credit report through my blog and seek out further input to help shape our research agenda. So, here’s an abbreviated version of the presentation I gave at Supernova – please let me know your thoughts and ideas on how to increase this research agenda's relevance and power.
There are two ways to catch a plane. The first, which happens to be the most common, is to leave on time, do your best to park nearby, repeatedly glance at your watch, and then start moving faster and faster. By the time you get to security, you realize that you're quite late, so you cut the line ("My plane leaves in 10 minutes!" you shout). You walk fast. As you get closer to your gate, you realize that walking fast isn't going to work, so you start to jog. Three gates away, you break into a run, and if you're lucky, you barely make the flight. The second way is to leave for the airport 10 minutes early. The easiest way to deal with change and with all the anxieties that go with it is not to deal with it at all. The easiest thing to do is to allow the urgency of the situation to force us to make the decisions (or take the actions) that we'd rather not take. Why? Because then we don't have accelerate dial up to take responsibility for what happens. The situation is at fault, not us. The beauty of the asymptotic curve is that at every step along the way, running ever faster for the plane is totally justified. The closer we get, the more we've invested ourselves. The more we invest in making our flight, the easier it is to justify running like a lunatic to make it. Years ago, I published a directory of law firms. No fewer than 70% of the firms sent their payment the night before it was due, by FedEx.
emigrant email supervision
There are two ways to catch a plane. The first, which happens to be the most common, is to leave on time, do your best to park nearby, repeatedly glance at your watch, and then start moving faster and stores in mall faster. By the time you get to security, you realize that you're quite late, so you cut the line ("My plane leaves in 10 minutes!" you shout). You walk fast. As you get closer to your gate, you realize that walking fast isn't going to work, so you start to jog. Three gates away, you break into a run, and if you're lucky, you barely make the flight. The second way is to leave for the airport 10 minutes early. The easiest way to deal with change and with all the anxieties that go with it is not to deal with it at all. The easiest thing to do is to allow the urgency of the situation to force us to make the decisions (or take the actions) that we'd rather not take. Why? Because then we don't have to take responsibility for what happens. The situation is at fault, not us. The beauty of the asymptotic curve is that at every step along the way, running ever faster for the plane is totally justified. The closer we get, the more we've invested ourselves. The more we invest in making our flight, the easier it is to justify running like a lunatic to make it. Years ago, I published a directory of law firms. No fewer than 70% of the firms sent their payment the night before it was due, by FedEx.
as some you know, we had to put back into kaneohe after trying to head north. in a nutshell, it was just too tough! instead of the 10 knot easterlies which were forecast ,we had building winds from the ne 18-23. we toughed it out for 3 days, covering 450 miles in 3 days, all with the #4 jib and a double reefed main. the swell was slightly different angel from the wind waves, so we were slamming constatnly. water sluicing over the boat at all times, lots of little leaks below. the third night, the newer and ostensibly more robust of the two tillerpilots crapped out, leaving us with only the old one for the remaining 1900 miles to seattle. the next morning the wind built to 24 knots. the barometer was only at 1017 si we knew it was a LONG way to more moderate winds. so we put about, and after another 3 ugly ugly days we are safe and sound back in Kaneohe, which is truly as close to heaven as you can imagine. will head into honolulu tomorrow to make arrangements for shipping the boat back. not wild about the money aspect, but i really think it would have been stupid monopoly tycoon and dangerous to conintue on. hope you are all well....tiz
Click Here
There are two ways to catch a plane. The first, which happens to be the most common, is to leave on time, do your best to park nearby, repeatedly glance at your watch, and then start moving faster and faster. By the time you get to security, you realize that you're quite late, so you cut the line ("My plane leaves in 10 minutes!" you shout). You walk fast. As you get closer to your gate, you realize that walking fast isn't going to work, so you start to jog. Three gates away, you break into a run, and if you're lucky, you barely make the flight. The second way is to leave for the airport 10 minutes early. The easiest way to deal mba school rankings with change and with all the anxieties that go with it is not to deal with it at all. The easiest thing to do is to allow the urgency of the situation to force us to make the decisions (or take the actions) that we'd rather not take. Why? Because then we don't have to take responsibility for what happens. The situation is at fault, not us. The beauty of the asymptotic curve is that at every step along the way, running ever faster for the plane is totally justified. The closer we get, the more we've invested ourselves. The more we invest in making our flight, the easier it is to justify running like a lunatic to make it. Years ago, I published a directory of law firms. No fewer than 70% of the firms sent their payment the night before it was due, by FedEx.
There are two ways to catch a plane. The first, which happens to be the most common, is to leave on time, do your best to park nearby, repeatedly glance at your watch, and then start moving faster and faster. By the time you get to security, you realize that you're quite late, so you cut the line ("My plane leaves in 10 minutes!" you shout). You walk fast. As you get closer to your gate, charge credit card you realize that walking fast isn't going to work, so you start to jog. Three gates away, you break into a run, and if you're lucky, you barely make the flight. The second way is to leave for the airport 10 minutes early. The easiest way to deal with change and with all the anxieties that go with it is not to deal with it at all. The easiest thing to do is to allow the urgency of the situation to force us to make the decisions (or take the actions) that we'd rather not take. Why? Because then we don't have to take responsibility for what happens. The situation is at fault, not us. The beauty of the asymptotic curve is that at every step along the way, running ever faster for the plane is totally justified. The closer we get, the more we've invested ourselves. The more we invest in making our flight, the easier it is to justify running like a lunatic to make it. Years ago, I published a directory of law firms. No fewer than 70% of the firms sent their payment the night before it was due, by FedEx.
I attended this extremely lively CAA session on art and appropriation yesterday at the NYC Bar Association and would like to re-cap: Reexamining Appropriation: The Copy, the Law, and Beyond Friday, February 16, 10:00 am - 12:30 pm New York City thank you sign language Bar Association Inappropriate? Copying in the Renaissance Lisa Pon , Meadows School of the Arts, Southern Methodist University The Reign of the Quotation–Appropriation and Its Audience Johanna Burton , Princeton University From Appropriation to Postproduction Jaimey Hamilton , University of Hawai'i, Manoa Appropriation v. Piracy, Round Two? The Hon. Pierre N. Leva l , United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit William Patry , Senior Copyright Counsel, Google Chairs : Martha Buskirk , Montserrat College of Art; Virginia Rutledge , Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP *** I will try to parse the speakers' presentations briefly below: Lisa Pon 's discussed the fact that "imitation" and copying was central to artistic practice during the Renaissance. She pointed to Vasari's "Lives" and his exhortation to one and all to imitate Michelangelo . She also talked about an interesting and apparently famous intellectual property dispute between Albrecht Durer and the Italian engraver Marcantonio Raimondi . (I'm sorry I haven't got more to say about this paper -- the speaker was thorough and the slides were really interesting. I was just getting into taking notes...
emigrant muscle and fitness
Click Here
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home